Camino Camera Confusion

I like photography; it is one of my greatest hobbies. My cousin Beth introduced me to single-lens reflex cameras in the late 1970's and it was love at first sight. I got my first job when I was 14, and saved up all summer to get a Pentax K-1000. I have always had and used an SLR since then.

A few years ago when I took Sammie to Hawaii, I re-evaluated my needs for the trip. I wanted a camera I could toss on the beach without fear of it being stolen (or at least small enough to hide), so I bought a simple point-and-shoot digital.  It wasn't anything spectacular, but it got the job done.

When I was packing for my Alaska trek, I put the point-and-shoot away and took my DSLR. It was a pain carrying one lens in my pocket and another on the camera, then swapping them out while hiking up to a glacier. On the other hand, the pictures I brought back were simply amazing.

In the guidebook, “Jack from Ireland” says that bringing a camera will inhibit a deep experience. Maybe that’s the vice of experience, seeing that he took all the pictures in the book, but that’s simply not an option for me. So, ignoring his advice, now it's time for me to wonder what camera I should bring with me on the Camino.

Last year I bought a used 18-250mm travel lens, so I don't have to worry about lens swapping. But the camera is still pretty bulky and heavy, especially once the lenses is mounted. Do I really want to carry around that much weight?

So, like I did for Hawaii, let me evaluate my needs.  The ideal camera would:

• Be light weight.
• Be at least 16 megapixels (I like to crop).
• Take standard batteries that I can buy along the way, instead of carrying a charger and a plug converter, and taking up valuable "outlet space" at the albergue.
• Have an integrated GPS receiver. If I'm travelling for a month, it would be nice for the photo itself to know where it was taken.
• Have zoom capability of at least 375mm (full frame equivalence).
• Be able to handle the elements.
• Involve as little cash outlay as possible.

So I did a search for cameras. I viewed the zoom and GPS as non-negotiables, so I eliminated anything without both. I also eliminated anything that would cost me over $300 (things that I already own or have access to cost me $0, so your mileage may vary). My search yielded these five options:

Camera	Weight	Batteries?	Pocket?	Zoom	Cost	Notes
Pentax K-30	1171g	YES	NO	375mm	Free	Weight includes Sigma 18-250mm lens and Pentax O-GPS1 receiver. Camera is weather-resistant, but lens isn't. I already own this, so nothing to buy.
Pentax K-01	1081g	NO	NO	375mm	Free	Weight includes Sigma 18-250mm lens and Pentax O-GPS1 receiver. No view finder, which is irritating, given the camera's weight and bulk. I already own this, so nothing to buy.
Nikon CoolPix P520	550g	NO	NO	1000mm	Free	Can borrow this, but walking around with something borrowed is more stressful to me than walking around with my own stuff. Even though it's lighter than the previous options, would still need to be worn around my neck full-time.
Nikon CoolPix S9700	232g	NO	YES	750mm	$275	Would have buy this. The fact that it can fit in the pocket is a very nice benefit. Has some bad reviews on Amazon for breaking.
Sony CyberShot HX50V	246g	NO	YES	720mm	$285	Would have buy this. Another "pocket camera". Pretty good reviews.

The K-01 is out—90 grams is not enough to justify its limitations over the K-30.  Between the CoolPix S9700 and the Cybershot HX50V, the Sony seems the superior camera, so that rules out the Nikon.

Of the remaining contenders, the Pentax is the most powerful and the Sony is the most convenient, with the Nikon being the happy medium. I’ll have to give it more thought, but it’s nice to know what the options are.